10 Ways to Increase the Use of Evaluation Findings

10 Ways to Increase the Use of Evaluation Findings

Person with magnifying glass, person working at a computer, person climbing a hill, and person at the top of a hill reaching their goal.
© Data for Impact

Editor’s note: This blog post was originally published on the American Evaluation Association AEA 365 blog on November 7, 2023. 

By Agata Slota, Cassandra Ake, and Lucinda Jones

We are Agata Slota, Cassandra Ake, and Lucinda Jones with the USAID-funded Data for Impact (D4I) project. D4I supports countries to generate and use high-quality data to improve their programs, policies, and health outcomes. Our activity with D4I focuses on identifying behavioral interventions to increase the use of evaluation findings. Here are 10 evidence-based approaches your organization can try.

1. Set up Timely Reminders and Prompts

Set up automated emails or on-screen pop-ups to alert staff of new findings when they are published online. Reminders to review evidence can be sent at key decision-making points in a project life cycle. Prompts can also be added to existing guidelines and checklists, making accessing evidence routine.

2. Build Staff’s Professional Identities as Evidence Users

People tend to align their actions with their beliefs about themselves. Reminding staff of their professional identity as evidence-informed decision makers can increase evidence use. Leaders can convey such messages in emails and presentations, and language in organizational policies, codes of conduct, and guiding principles can be updated accordingly.

3. Strengthen Capacity Using Effective Adult Learning Techniques

Capacity-strengthening programs meant to increase the understanding and application of evidence should also increase individuals’ motivation. These programs can use proven adult learning techniques, such as actively engaging participants through hands-on workshops with peers.

4. Create Targeted Communication Products

Creating targeted communication products increases the likelihood of people paying attention to and absorbing information. To do this, identify the various audience groups for the evaluation findings, assess what aspects of the findings are most relevant and useful to them, and create products that are tailored in terms of formats, messages, and language.

5. Design User-Friendly Evidence Repositories and Resources for Accessing Findings

Make online evidence repositories more effective by (1) focusing on the user experience: designing and updating the repository from the point of view of the target audiences’ needs, interests, and accessibility requirements; (2) using data visualizations such as infographics and dashboards; and (3) synthesizing findings to help reduce information overload.

6. Accredit Individuals Following Training Completion

Offering accreditation can incentivize individuals to receive training on evidence use. For example, an organization can offer training that leads to accreditation as an Evidence Dissemination Expert. When clients and employers require or view accreditation favorably, individuals are more likely to participate in training and apply the techniques learned.

7. Strengthen Organizational Norms around Evidence Use

Organizational norms can increase evaluation findings’ use by reinforcing evidence use expectations. Norms can be reinforced by making people aware of how frequently their colleagues use evaluation findings and how much they approve of using evidence for decision making, or by publicly recognizing evidence users through awards.

8. Build a Community of Evidence Use Champions

Designate selected staff as Evidence Use Champions who will model evidence use and share new evidence with others. Champions should receive training in areas such as advocacy, and then be connected to other champions, for instance, through communities of practice. They should have clearly defined roles and objectives and be supported in this role by their organization’s leaders.

9. Create Structured Collaborations between Evaluators and Evidence Users

To be effective at increasing the use of evidence, interactions between evaluators and evidence users need to be structured and well planned, with clear objectives. These interactions need to build trust by ensuring transparency, demonstrating evaluator independence, and creating opportunities for regular contact.

10. Use Stories to Communicate Findings

Stories create emotional connections between storytellers and the audience, helping messages be absorbed, remembered, and shared further. Consider leading a communication product with a presentation of findings in narrative form—a short case study, an explanation of a finding in a broader context, or a story of how an evaluator overcame a research challenge.

Rad Resources
  • Breckon, J., and Dodson, J. (2016). Using Evidence: What works? (Discussion paper).  https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/Alliance%20Policy%20Using%20evidence%20v4.pdf?ver=2016-04-12-152711-000
  • Langer L, Tripney J, Gough D (2016). The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/Science%202016%20Langer%20report.pdf?ver=2016-04-18-142701-867
  • Otten, J., Cheng, K., and Drewnowski, A. (2015). Infographics and Public Policy: Using Data Visualization to Convey Complex Information. Health Affairs, 34 (11): 1901–7. 0.1377/hlthaff.2015.0642
  • Cairney, P. and Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Commun, 3. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8
  • Yamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S., and Levy, S. (2019). Using Social Norms to Change Behavior and Increase Sustainability in the Real World: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 11 (20):5847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205847
  • Cunningham-Erves J, Stewart E, Duke J, Akohoue SA, Rowen N, Lee O, Miller ST. Training researchers in dissemination of study results to research participants and communities. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1411-1419. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab023. PMID: 33823019; PMCID: PMC8320879.
  • Cvitanovic, C., Shellock, R.J., Mackay, M., van Putten, E.I., Karcher, D.B., Dickey-Collas, M., and Ballesteros, M. (2021) Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange
  • Behavioral Interventions for the Use of Evaluation Findings at the Interface of Environmental Science and Policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 123: 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020

Click here to learn more about how D4I promotes data use.

Additional Resources:


Authors:

Agata Slota leads the D4I Behavioral Interventions for the Use of Evaluation Findings activity. She is a Behavior Change, Research and Communications Senior Manager at Palladium, applying insights from behavioral science and strategic communications on projects that span sectors and geographies. Agata has master’s degrees in behavioral science and in international affairs.

Cassandra Ake has focused on the review of barriers and enablers to evidence use that is presented in the D4I Behavioral Interventions for the Use of Evaluation Findings study. She is a Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Senior Associate at Palladium, and works on multiple D4I activities and MEL initiatives. Cassandra completed her master’s degree in international development policy, with a strong econometrics focus.

Lucinda Jones has developed a number of the strategies proposed by the D4I Behavioral Interventions for the Use of Evaluation Findings activity. She is a Senior Associate of Health and Behavioural Science at Palladium and works across a variety of projects, focusing on health and behavior change. Lucinda’s bachelor’s degree is in psychological and behavioral sciences, and her master’s degree is in development studies.