Existence of legislation criminalizing FGM aligned with international laws, protocols, and treaties Existence of legislation criminalizing FGM aligned with international laws, protocols, and treaties Definition: National policies or legislation exist criminalizing female genital mutilation (FGM). Data Requirement: Evidence of law(s) prohibiting FGM Data Calculation: This indicator is qualitative and determined through a review of relevant laws. Data Sources: Legal statutes, policies, resolutions found in Ministry of Justice or other relevant government documents; regular updates of the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs; policy database maintained by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); analyses conducted by the nongovernmental organization (NGO) 28 Too Many, which has produced a detailed analysis of laws and recommendations for each country where FGM is practiced (https://www.fgmcri.org/thematic/law-and-fgm/). Finally, the World Bank updated the Compendium of International and National Legal Frameworks on FGM in 2020; all national legal frameworks on FGM are compiled (World Bank, 2021). Purpose: The existence of legislation criminalizing FGM indicates the willingness of a government to comply with its international obligation to eliminate FGM. It provides an enabling environment for social norms to change. This indicator measures whether people are legally protected by national legislation. Laws not only ensure that FGM is criminalized and that survivors can claim their right to justice but also play a role in prevention, where awareness of the law is raised within communities. This can contribute to changing social norms and individual attitudes regarding FGM. Legislation should align with international human rights standards and must respond to certain criteria to be an effective vehicle for prevention and response. All parties engaged in any form of FGM should be liable for prosecution. In addition to aligning with international standards, national laws should include the duty and obligation for those aware of FGM to report that the crime has taken place or is planned. This includes FGM practiced by health professionals inside or outside health establishments and cases that occur across national borders and/or involve practitioners from other regions or neighboring countries (28 Too Many, 2018). Issues: This indicator measures the existence of laws prohibiting FGM but not the implementation or enforcement of the laws. Legal measures that follow international standards are important, but allocating financial and technical resources, along with political will, to enforce them are also necessary. Imposing sanctions alone runs the risk of driving the practice underground and having a very limited impact on behavior. The laws should be linked to the broader process of social change accompanied by information and other measures that promote increased public support for ending the practice. The amendment, adoption, and enforcement of laws should be done in consultation with community and religious leaders and other civil society representatives. Mechanisms should be established to review and assess the enforcement of the laws regularly (UNAIDS et al., 2008). Gender Implications: FGM has been recognized as discrimination based on sex because it is rooted in gender inequalities and power imbalances between men and women and inhibits women’s full and equal enjoyment of their human rights. It is a form of violence against girls and women, with physical and psychological consequences. International conventions and protocols explicitly recognize that practices harmful to women and girls, such as FGM, violate their human rights to life, liberty, and security of the person (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2008). When countries sign on to these conventions or enact their own laws criminalizing FGM, it is an acknowledgment that FGM is a form of gender-based violence that must be abandoned. Similar Indicator: Female Genital Mutilation Legislation Index. The index is based on a review and comparison of laws and treaty obligations, and results in a score ranging from 1 – 12; with a score of zero if no legislation exists. The index can be used to measure progress of a program when assessed at baseline and periodically as needed throughout the duration of the program. References: UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. 2008. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. World Health Organization. UNICEF, Innocenti Research Centre. 2008. Platform for Action Towards the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). The Donors Working Group on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Center for Reproductive Rights. 2008. Female Genital Mutilation: Legal Prohibitions Worldwide. http://reproductiverights.org/en/document/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-legal-prohibitions-worldwide World Bank. 2021. Compendium of International and National Legal Frameworks on Female Genital Mutilation, Fifth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1596/35112 Measuring effectiveness of female genital mutilation elimination: A compendium of Indicators. Prepared and published by UNFPA and UNICEF on behalf of the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the elimination of female genital mutilation: Accelerating Change, 2020. Related Content Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Policy Environment Filed under: Family Planning, female genital cutting, FP, FP/RH, Indicators, policy, Reproductive Health, RH, violence, women's status